The central focus of time, eternity and the
Christian faith is the Cross of Calvary. Failure to understand the Cross has
brought Western Christendom to a place of impotence.
Proper understanding will lead to revival,
recovery and victory.
For an example of this misunderstanding of
the Cross, I take a passage from
The Cross of Christ by Dr. John Stott.
Father Stott, an ordained minister in the
Church of England and a leader of the world-wide Christian Evangelical movement,
was described by
Time
Magazine shortly before his death in 2011, as one of the top 100
most influential people in the world.
Here
is what this respected Christian and world leader had to say about the Cross:
“Granted
this fundamental fact about all who are in Christ, namely that we have died and risen with him so that our old
life of sin, guilt and shame has been
terminated and an entirely new life of holiness, forgiveness and freedom has begun, what is our attitude to
be? Because our new self, though redeemed,
is still fallen, a double attitude will be necessary, namely self–denial and self affirmation, both illumined by the
cross.”[1]
It does not require a degree in theology
to understand, and I say this with all due respect, that the plain English
language meaning of this paragraph is absurd on its face. It is the
promulgation of just such a confused view of the Cross that has led the Western Church to the verge of defeat.
Let us take deeper look at this paragraph
1.
The first sentence states that the fundamental fact is that all who are in Christ are dead, “we have died” and we
are risen with him.“Our old life of sin, guilt and shame has been
terminated…an entirely new life of holiness, forgiveness and freedom has begun…” These declarations by Rev. Stott are a bedrock re-statement of
the God’s revealed truth — the message
of the New Testament, with which we heartily agree.
2.
What follows is not a logical conclusion to draw from the facts previously presented:
a.
“…what is to be the attitude to our new self?”
The assumption that Fr. Stott is making
here is that the Christian has a
new self; but what has already been stated is that this old nature, the sinner the old self is dead. Scripture does not support the idea that we are given a new self. The Apostle Paul
says, “I have been crucified with Christ;
nevertheless, I live, yet not I. Christ lives in me…” Galatians 2:20 KJV) (“…it is no longer I who live,”
NKJV)
We have died with Christ, yet we are miraculously
and marvelously alive in Him; yet we no longer live as ego, (Greek: yet not
I – yet not ego - ouke'ti egoo').
This ego-less living is never perfected, but it is given to us by grace as we stand in our new position, daily reckoning ourselves
to be dead. “I die daily.” 1 Cor
15:31 KJV
b. Dr. Stott
adds, “Because our new self, though redeemed is still fallen…”
Now, if this is true (and many Christian
leaders agree with Rev. Stott’s teaching
on this) then the Christian religion is a fraud and a complete lie. For, if the work of the Christ on the
Cross does not give us real redemption — real victory over sin and self, and does not save us
from our fallen estate, then it is worthless and deserves to
be rejected by all rational
people.
c. Then Dr. Stott asserts
that the way we are to maintain our salvation is
by “namely self-denial and self affirmation….”
A true understanding of the work of the
Cross first puts us under conviction and then brings us to repentance.
There we examine ourselves and
confess all sin to God and affirm that it has been nailed to the Cross; we daily reckon ourselves to be dead and affirm that we have been crucified with Christ.
The Apostle Paul scolded the Galatians for
trying to grow in grace by self effort:
You crazy Galatians! Did someone put a hex on you? Have you taken
leave of your senses? Something crazy has happened, for it's obvious
that you no longer have the crucified Jesus in
clear focus in your lives.
His sacrifice on the
Cross was certainly set before you clearly enough.
Let me put this question to you: How did
your new life begin? Was it by
working your heads off to please God? Or was it by responding to God's Message
to you? 3 Are you going to continue this craziness? For only crazy people would think they
could complete by their own efforts what
was begun by God. If you weren't smart enough or strong enough to begin it, how do you suppose
you could perfect it? 4 Did you go through this
whole painful learning process for nothing? It is not yet a total loss, but it certainly will be
if you keep this up! Galatians 3:1-4 [2]
3. Dr. Stott is correct in one respect. There is
a doubleness that has to be considered in the sanctified life.
However, it is not that we need to have a “double attitude.” We need to
remember that there are not two minds at issue
here, but there are two bodies.
So also is the resurrection of the dead. The body is
sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. 43 It is
sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is
sown in weakness, it is raised in power. 44 It is sown a natural body, it is raised a
spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. NKJV 1 Cor
15:42-4
Jesus, though his regenerating word, sows
in us from above a new resurrection body to replace the one that died in the
garden. He replaces our self, the disembodied voice that says “I doubt,
therefore I am”[3] with the
voice of the Holy Spirit which now leads us into all truth. Though we remain on
earth for a period of time after our conversion, our inner man — our resurrected
body (spirit man) — is firmly seated in heavenly places[4],
simply waiting for God to end our sojourn on earth.
Low Church Anglicans, meeting with other
denominational leaders at Keswick England starting in 1875[5],
developed a teaching which emphasized the believer’s death, burial and
resurrection with Jesus by focusing on the 6th Chapter of Paul’s
Letter to the Romans. The conference was led by such great Anglican evangelicals
as Rev. T.D. Harford-Battersby, Rev. Evan Hopkins, Prebendary H. Webb-Peploe,
Rev. Charles Fox, Rev, Handley C.G. Moule – Presbyterians George H.C.
Macgregor, and J. Elder Cumming, Dutch Reformed Minister Andrew Murray and
Baptist F.B. Meyer. The conferences were
also attended by D.L. Moody and C.I. Schofield as well as missionaries J.
Hudson Taylor and Amy Carmichael.
These leaders who heard and carried the Keswick massage around the globe
formed the foundation of American fundamentalism of the late 19th
and early 20th Century.
Jessie Penn-Lewis, a member of Evan Hopkins’ church and a student of the
writings of Andrew Murray, became a fervent preacher of the message of the Cross.
She was a vessel that the Lord used mightily in the first Pentecostal revival
in Wales
in 1904-05. Keswick teaching helped form the Pentecostal movement in the United States
though the popularity of the Schofield Bible.
Mrs. Penn-Lewis preached the message of
the Cross at Keswick in 1908 and ‘changed’ a young Lutheran Pastor Frank N.D. Buchman
who later went on to form the Oxford Group[6] in
the 1930’s and led revivals around the world. His work led to the formation of
A.A. which, at its core, was built upon the Keswick understanding of the
necessity of getting rid of the self-centered life in order to have a life
guided by God.
- ·
Simple but not
easy; a price had to be paid. It meant destruction of self-centeredness. [7]
- ·
But God forbid
that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the
world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world. Gal 6:14 KJV
[1] The Cross of Christ,
Stott, John R.W., IVP Books, Downers Grove, IL, USA, 2006, p. 271
[2] The Message: The Bible in
Contemporary Language © 2002 by Eugene H. Peterson. We do not always agree
with Peterson’s paraphrase, but on this one we say that he got it exactly
right.
[5] So Great Salvation;
Barabas, Steven; Wipf and Stock Publishers, Eugene OR
[6] Not to be confused with
the Oxford Movement of the first half of the 19
th century.
[7] Alcoholics Anonymous 4
th
Edition, NY, AA World Services, p. 14